As we can see in the picture, RxSwift is way slower than built-in functions and for-in loop as well. The built-in functions solution is 5.14x faster than RxSwift and the for-in loop solution is 12.21x faster than RxSwift. Please, do not use RxSwift when you need to work with a huge amount of data! ConclusionAccording to test cases, there is nothing wrong with using high-order functions when we do NOT need to chain them. The performance is way better (1.63x faster) when we use built-in map function or slightly better/worse when we use built-in filter/reduce. If we want to chain high-order functions we should consider not using them and implementing them as a for-in loop solution. The performance is way better, 2.37x faster (in examples of this article) than built-in functions. There is no need to always use modern elements, structures, or functions of a modern language just because the syntax looks better or everyone uses it. Time and space complexity is way more important than modern syntax and in the end, the fancy syntax does not make us better developers, even though we might think it does. Python provides a variety of GUI (Graphic User Interface) types such as PyQT, Tkinter, Kivy, WxPython, and PySide. Among them, Note: Tkinter(capital T) is different from the tkinter. Tkinter is used in Python2.x and is changed to tkinter in Python.3x. Combobox is a combination of Listbox and an entry field. It is one of the Tkinter widgets where it contains a down arrow to select from a list of options. It helps the users to select according to the list of options displayed. When the user clicks on the drop-down arrow on the entry field, a pop up of the scrolled Listbox is displayed down the entry field. The selected option will be displayed in the entry field only when an option from the Listbox is selected. Syntax: combobox = ttk.Combobox(master, option=value, ...) Example 1: Combobox widget without setting a default value.
Output: Example 2: Combobox with initial default values.
|