Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G has been announced on January 2020 whereas Samsung Exynos 880 has been announced on May 2020. Check out detailed comparison with key specs below: Show
Benchmark Comparison: Snapdragon 720G vs Exynos 880Benchmark measures the performance of the CPU. Geekbench is a benchmark that measures a processor's single core performance and AnTuTu score is the most popular and trustable benchmarking score which evaluates multi core performance. Snapdragon 720G has an AnTuTu benchmark score of 281212 points with CPU, GPU, Memory, UX score 99886, 71529, 50549, 52632 respectively. CPU Comparison: Snapdragon 720G vs Exynos 880CPU speed shows how many processing cycles per second can be executed by a CPU. Snapdragon 720G comes up with the architecture of Adreno 600 and Exynos 880 comes up with architecture of Bifrost. Former one has 8 core and 2300 MHz frequency and latter has 8 cores and 2000 MHz frequency. A larger cache time leads to faster performance. Graphics Comparison: Snapdragon 720G vs Exynos 880Qualcomm Snapdragon 720G has Adreno 618 GPU with GPU Frequency as 750 MHz. Dynamic frequency allows the processor to conserve power and reduce noise when it is under a light load. Samsung Exynos 880 has Mali G76 MP5 GPU with GPU Frequency as 720 MHz. Memory Comparison: Snapdragon 720G vs Exynos 880First chipset has max size of 8 GB and Samsung Exynos 880 has max size of 8 GB. It shows the maximum amount of memory supported by a chipset. Multimedia and Connectivity Comparison: Snapdragon 720G vs Exynos 880In terms of multimedia, Snapdragon 720G has Qualcomm Hexagon 692 DSP NPU with storage type as UFS 2.1 and Exynos 880 has Yes NPU and eMMC 5.1, UFS 2.1 storage type. Samsung Exynos 7880 vs Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 vs Samsung Exynos 7870 OctaSamsung Exynos 7880► remove from comparison  The Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7780 is a 64-bit SoC for mainstream smartphones and tablets (usually Android based). It was announced early 2017 and integrates eight Cortex-A53 cores clocked at up to 1.9 GHz. It is manufactured in the modern 14 nm FinFET process at Samsung and integrates an LTE Cat 7 modem. The (dual channel?) memory controller supports LPDDR4 RAM. Additionally, the SoC integrates GPS, GLONASS and Baido positioning systems, UHD / HEVC (H.265) video de- and encoding and UFS 2.0 / eMMC 5.1 storage. Qualcomm Snapdragon 625► remove from comparison The Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 (SD625) is a mid-range octa-core SoC with eight ARM Cortex-A53 cpu cores at up to 2 GHz, an Adreno 506 GPU, a DDR3L-1866 memory controller and a X9 LTE (Cat 7, 4G+, 300 Mbps down, 150 Mbps up) modem. Furthermore, the chip supports 802.11ac WiFi and Bluetooth 4.1. It is manufactured in 14nm FinFet. The processor performance should be similar to a HiSilicon Kirin 650, which also offers 8 Cortex A53 cores at up to 2 GHz. However, due to the modern manufacturing process, power consumption and throttling should be better with the Snapdragon 625. Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa► remove from comparison The Samsung Exynos 7 Octa is a 64-bit SoC for mainstream smartphones and tablets (usually Android based). It was announced in February 2016 and integrates eight Cortex-A53 cores, which are manufactured in a modern 14-nm process. Compared to the previous 28-nm-SoCs, the performance was increased and the power consumption is 30 % lower according to Samsung. The integrated LZE Cat.6 modem reaches transfer rates of up to 300 Mbps (downstream) and 50 Mbps (upstream). The dual-channel memory controller supports LPDDR3-1866 RAM. The graphics adapter ARM Mali-T830 MP2 (core clock of 700 MHz according to Wikipedia) is also used in combination with the HiSilicon Kirin 650 SoC. Besides OpenGL ES 3.2, it also supports OpenCL 1.2 as well as DirectX 11 (FL 9_3). The performance is sufficient for common Android games from 2016 at medium details.
Benchmarks3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Physics 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Extreme Physics min: 13538 avg: 13679 median: 13678.5 (11%) max: 13819 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Ice Storm Unlimited Physics min: 14195 avg: 15727 median: 15836.5 (13%) max: 16267 Points min: 6184 avg: 11907 median: 12776 (11%) max: 12955 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot Extreme (ES 3.1) Unlimited Physics min: 1638 avg: 1936 median: 1992 (25%) max: 2119 Points min: 1595 avg: 1679 median: 1709 (21%) max: 1776 Points 3DMark - 3DMark Sling Shot (ES 3.0) Unlimited Physics min: 1638 avg: 1962 median: 2003 (29%) max: 2452 Points min: 1601 avg: 1675 median: 1674 (24%) max: 1762 Points Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Single-Core Geekbench 5.0 - Geekbench 5.0 64 Bit Multi-Core Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Single-Core min: 841 avg: 866 median: 872.5 (9%) max: 881 Points min: 726 avg: 732 median: 732 (8%) max: 736 Points Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 - Geekbench 4.1 - 4.4 64 Bit Multi-Core min: 3148 avg: 4171 median: 4319.5 (5%) max: 4396 Points min: 3704 avg: 3728 median: 3710 (4%) max: 3777 Points Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Single-Core min: 795 avg: 824 median: 820 (13%) max: 845 Points min: 680 avg: 696 median: 682 (11%) max: 726 Points Geekbench 4.0 - Geekbench 4.0 64 Bit Multi-Core min: 2525 avg: 3116 median: 2984 (7%) max: 4042 Points min: 3277 avg: 3285 median: 3284.5 (8%) max: 3292 Points Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Multi-Core Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 32 Bit Single-Core Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Multi-Core Geekbench 3 - Geekbench 3 64 Bit Single-Core Mozilla Kraken 1.1 - Kraken 1.1 Total Score * min: 8028 avg: 9289 median: 9316 (11%) max: 12194 ms min: 6784 avg: 9156 median: 9670 (11%) max: 11916 ms Octane V2 - Octane V2 Total Score min: 3781 avg: 4524 median: 4502 (5%) max: 4979 Points min: 3721 avg: 4164 median: 3880 (4%) max: 4968 Points WebXPRT 3 - WebXPRT 3 Score min: 35 avg: 36.5 median: 36.5 (10%) max: 38 Points min: 31 avg: 31.5 median: 31.5 (8%) max: 32 Points Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Metal Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Multicore Beta Vellamo 3.x - Vellamo 3.x Browser Quadrant Standard Edition 2.0 - Quadrant Standard 2.0 Total Score AnTuTu v6 - AnTuTu v6 Total Score min: 59867 avg: 63396 median: 63206 (22%) max: 68348 Points min: 44191 avg: 45944 median: 45593 (16%) max: 47339 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 MEM min: 4570 avg: 5923 median: 5907.5 (18%) max: 7431 Points min: 4775 avg: 5190 median: 5140.5 (16%) max: 5703 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 UX min: 19447 avg: 20817 median: 20902.5 (26%) max: 21974 Points min: 15443 avg: 16057 median: 16019 (20%) max: 16745 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 GPU min: 12718 avg: 12942 median: 12832.5 (4%) max: 13599 Points min: 8143 avg: 8405 median: 8393.5 (3%) max: 8688 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 CPU min: 25992 avg: 36737 median: 38406.5 (24%) max: 40836 Points min: 31778 avg: 32396 median: 32448 (20%) max: 32911 Points AnTuTu v7 - AnTuTu v7 Total Score min: 65759 avg: 76418 median: 77841.5 (14%) max: 81789 Points min: 61794 avg: 62047 median: 61818 (11%) max: 62758 Points AndEBench - AndEBench Java AndEBench - AndEBench Native PassMark PerformanceTest Mobile V1 - PerformanceTest Mobile V1 CPU Tests PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work 2.0 Battery Life min: 669 avg: 719 median: 718.5 (14%) max: 768 min PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score 2.0 min: 4626 avg: 4894 median: 4850.5 (32%) max: 5558 Points min: 3722 avg: 3800 median: 3799 (25%) max: 3889 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Work Score min: 4596 avg: 5855 median: 5718.5 (29%) max: 7846 Points min: 3691 avg: 4746 median: 4899 (25%) max: 5006 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Computer Vision min: 2400 avg: 2450 median: 2424 (13%) max: 2520 Points min: 2016 avg: 2023 median: 2024 (11%) max: 2030 Points PCMark for Android - PCM f. Android Storage min: 2335 avg: 4177 median: 4267 (9%) max: 5580 Points min: 3440 avg: 3508 median: 3536 (8%) max: 3549 Points Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7880 → 100% n=12Average Benchmarks Qualcomm Snapdragon 625 → 105% n=12Average Benchmarks Samsung Exynos 7870 Octa → 90% n=12 - Range of benchmark values for this graphics
card * Smaller numbers mean a higher performance 1 This benchmark is not used for the average calculation v1.19 log 24. 21:57:30 #0 checking url part for id 8474 +0s ... 0s #1 checking url part for id 8168 +0s ... 0s #2 checking url part for id 8118 +0s ... 0s #3 not redirecting to Ajax server +0s ... 0s #4 did not recreate cache, as it is less than 5 days old! Created at Thu, 24 Nov 2022 12:15:05 +0100 +0s ... 0s #5 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.005s #6 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.007s #7 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.006s ... 0.012s #8 composed specs +0s ... 0.013s #9 did output specs +0s ... 0.013s #10 getting avg benchmarks for device 8474 +0s ... 0.013s #11 got single benchmarks 8474 +0.007s ... 0.02s #12 getting avg benchmarks for device 8168 +0s ... 0.021s #13 got single benchmarks 8168 +0.033s ... 0.054s #14 getting avg benchmarks for device 8118 +0s ... 0.054s #15 got single benchmarks 8118 +0.019s ... 0.073s #16 got avg benchmarks for devices +0s ... 0.073s #17 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.077s #18 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.079s #19 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.08s #20 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.002s ... 0.081s #21 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.082s #22 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.004s ... 0.087s #23 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.088s #24 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.005s ... 0.093s #25 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.007s ... 0.099s #26 linkCache_getLink no uid found +0.001s ... 0.1s #27 min, max, avg, median took s +0.002s ... 0.103s #28 return log +0s ... 0.103s Samsung Exynos 850 setara dengan Snapdragon berapa?Samsung Exynos 850 kurang lebih setara dengan Qualcomm Snapdragon 460, 630.
Exynos 1280 setara Snapdragon apa?Melihat spesifikasi di atas, kita bisa menganggap bahwa Exynos 1280 setara dengan beberapa chipset menengah lain seperti Qualcomm Snapdragon 695, Snapdragon 778G, MediaTek Dimensity 900, serta Dimensity 920.
Berapa skor AnTuTu Exynos 1280?Dalam catatan nanoreview, Exynos 1280 meraih skor AnTuTu 9 sebesar 434.869.
|
Exynos 880 setara dengan Snapdragon berapa?
Pos Terkait
Copyright © 2024 apacode Inc.
